Canadians oppose new, tougher mortgage

Nearly one-quarter of Canadians do not agree with the federal government's mortgage lending crackdown, a proportion that rises to nearly a third among non-homeowners, survey results done for a mortgage lending firm suggest.

And only 45 per cent agree with the tighter mortgage lending rules and that the federal government needs to protect Canadian homeowners, a level of support for the changes that falls even further to just one-quarter among non-homeowners, according to the online survey conducted by pollster Angus Reid for ResMor Trust Co.

In an effort to avoid a U.S.-style housing market meltdown, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty last month tightened up the rules governing mortgage lending practices in Canada, including limiting the amortization period for government insured mortgages to 35 years from 40 years, requiring a minimum down payment of five per cent for such mortgages, virtually eliminating zero-down mortgages, and requiring that anybody with an insured mortgage have a minimum credit score.

Those who disagree with the measures said they reduce options for people wanting to buy a home.

However, the results also indicate that 17 per cent do not understand the changes, including 25 per cent of non-homeowners.

Further, the findings suggest that the higher the level of understanding, the lower the level of opposition to the new rules.

"I was surprised that 23 per cent do not agree with the measures," Darren Thompson, vice-president of lending for ResMor Trust, said in an interview.

"This survey clearly demonstrates a need for industry professionals to educate Canadians about the new measures, specifically those entering the market for the first time," he said, adding that's something that the federally licensed trust company is doing.

"The measures are not seriously impacting the ability of consumers to get a mortgage," he said, citing as an example an industry finding that more than half of those who took out 40-year mortgages would have qualified for a 25-year mortgage. "It was just enabling them to get a lower monthly payment but at a much greater interest cost."

Thompson also disagreed with critics of the measures who have warned that the tighter rules will put an added chill on an already cooling housing market.

"There's still lots of financing out there," he said, adding that the measures protect the Canadian taxpayer from having to foot a large bailout if the market goes south as it has in the U.S.

The survey, meanwhile, also revealed a regional divide in the level of support for the tighter rules and the level of understanding of the rules.

Agreement with the new rules in the heated housing markets of the Western provinces and in Ontario is significantly higher than in the Eastern provinces and Quebec, the report said, noting support for the crackdown was 64 per cent in British Columbia, 56 per cent in Alberta, 47 per cent in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, 46 per cent in Ontario, but only 35 per cent in the Atlantic provinces and 34 per cent in Quebec.

The proportion indicating a lack of understanding of the new rules was highest in Quebec and Atlantic Canada, at 23 per cent in both markets, and lowest in British Columbia at only seven per cent, followed by 13 per cent in Manitoba and Saskatchewan, 18 per cent in Alberta, and 16 per cent in Ontario.

The online survey of at least 1,000 adults conducted last month following the release of the new rules is considered accurate within 3.1 percentage points 19 times out 20.

Mortgage crisis in Canada

Too many housing starts means crunch 'may come soon,'Lost amid concern over United States government agencies moving in to support mortgage lenders Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae plus IndyMac Bankcorp, was a warning that Canada could soon face its own mortgage crisis.

Peter Hall, vice-president and chief economist with Export Development Canada, said in a report that in addition to U.S. housing woes, housing starts were down 56 per cent year-over-year during May in the United Kingdom, 18 per cent during the first quarter of the year in Spain and 17 per cent year-over-year in May in France.

Hall noted that housing starts in Canada are "soaring on the strength of the domestic economy and a huge dollop of very well-timed fiscal stimulus," and that a continuing excess of housing starts over requirements means "Canada's turn may come soon" for a housing crisis.

The report came in the wake of the Canadian government's attempt to avoid a housing crisis by no longer insuring mortgages with more than 35-year amortization periods and less than five-per-cent down payments as of Oct. 15.

Homebuyers with less than a 20-per-cent down payment are required to have their mortgage insured through the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation -- a Crown corporation -- or a handful of private firms that have entered the mortgage-insurance market.

In 2006, the government extended the maximum amortization period from 25 to 40 years, adding hundreds of thousands of dollars in interest costs. Last year, 37 per cent of mortgages taken out were for longer than 25 years.

Soon after the Canadian changes were announced, the United States Federal Reserve Board tightened up its mortgage-lending policies. As of Oct. 1, the Fed will require lenders to verify a borrower's income in determining repayment ability, to take a lender's ability to repay a loan from income into consideration, to establish escrow accounts for property taxes and homeowners insurance in certain cases, and basically to advertise rates and payments with clear notice if a rate isn't fixed.

One reason why U.S. lenders were willing to give mortgages to people with an unproven ability to make payments was that the lenders were able to package the loans with others and sell them to other institutions. Had the lenders been forced to hold the debt themselves, which is somewhat the case in Canada, lending would have been less reckless.

Rather than abating, the U.S. housing problem grows worse by the day, with foreclosures expected to flood the market with homes for sale early in 2009.

Things have deteriorated so badly in the U.S. that the Treasury Department will extend credit if needed to prop up Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, two government-sponsored enterprises that hold nearly half of all American mortgages.

The GSEs each include a debt component and an equity component, with the latter falling in value as investors sold off shares due to concern over rising mortgage defaults.

Famed U.S. commodities investor Jim Rogers called the Treasury plan an "unmitigated disaster." Mortgage lenders are "basically insolvent," and taxpayers will be left footing the bill, according to Rogers.

At the same time, U.S. government agencies stepped in to take over IndyMac Bankcorp, after helping to bail out Bear Stearns. That leaves about 90 financial institutions -- out of about 7,500 -- set to go under.

Meanwhile, portfolio manager Adrian Mastracci of Vancouver-based CKM Wealth Management offers sound tips for homebuyers:

- Consider a condominium or townhouse as a starter home.

Remember that in addition to the purchase price of a home, you may have legal and realtor costs, expenses for moving, renovations, furniture, repairs, maintenance, property taxes, insurance and utilities.

- Save 20 per cent for a down payment to reduce extra fees, consider taking money from your registered retirement savings plan through the Home Buyers Plan, and forego making non-registered investments because you would need an 8.9-per-cent return to do better than paying down a 5.75-per-cent mortgage if you're in the 35-per-cent tax bracket.